Local AMA Delegates respond
to the
President's Health System Reform proposals
Joint Letter to the Editor
published in the
Florida Times Union on June 24, 2009
Written by Alan Harmon, MD; Thomas
Peters, MD;
Ashley Booth, MD; and John Montgomery, MD
Our American Medical Association is actively working
for health system reform that provides affordable, high
quality health care coverage for all Americans.
The AMA supports reform that is backed by the best
evidence that improves quality, patient safety and cost
reduction. The AMA favors patients actively
participating in preventative health care and wellness
programs.
Improved management of chronic disease, increased
coordination of care by primary physicians,
implementation of advanced health information technology
and the formation of integrated health care delivery
systems have been documented to improve care and reduce
costs. More ...
Read the entire editorial on the Florida Times Union's
website:
Health care: AMA plan supports quality |
Jacksonville.com
Or click
here for a PDF of the editorial from
www.jacksonville.com
Comments from Thomas G. Peters, MD, FACS, FASN,
AMA delegate
I think we would all agree that the President was welcomed by the
HOD, and that much of what he said is factually so, or—in the case of some
reform—desirable. His comment that he did not favor caps on malpractice
awards for non-economic damages (caps which have worked so well in many states,
including Florida)
was disappointing, and invoked the only negative response from the House.
His comments about access to care, eliminating health insurance exclusions for
pre-existing disease, and less reliance on the SGR (the current physician
payment modeling system) are welcomed. So are many of the issues he raised
such as the EMR and continuity of care with one’s own physician. However,
for this administration and this congress, the devil is in the details. We
must remember that with all government support and reform comes regulation, and
regulation is seldom enabling. In fact, with health care, regulation is
almost always stifling—sometimes with fatal outcomes for patients.
The AMA positions to eliminate the SGR, improve the malpractice
circumstance, enable private contracting, relieve doctors from restrictions on
information sharing (anti-trust), and promote personal health responsibility
among all Americans seem sensible and laudable.
Finally, implementation of reform will be neither quick, cheap,
nor politically painless. Surely, unforeseen consequences of
well-intentioned legislation and regulatory reform will actually hurt some
patients and physician practices. We may think that we know what we want,
and improvements can be made. But, disappointments must be expected and
addressing problems will be needed no matter what reforms ultimately emerge.
|
Resources
From the DCMS
Read the advance copies of the
President's Message and Editorial from the
forthcoming issue of Northeast Florida Medicine
by clicking on the links below:
President's
Message
by R. Stephen Lucie, MD
The Healthcare Reform Train
Has Left The Station
From the
Editor's Desk
by John Kilkenny, MD
Promises, Promises
From the FMA
Letter
from FMA to Congress
regarding H.R. 3200
From the AMA website:
(you will be redirected
to AMA website)
Message from AMA President on
H.R. 3200 - July 18, 2009
(video, 2m:27s)
H.R. 3200 FAQ
President Obama Receives Warm Welcome from AMA
Physicians
AMA
Six Guiding Principles of
Health System Reform
Kaiser Family Foundation
Health Care Reform Gateway
Includes side-by-side comparisons of major
health care reform proposals, charts and
interactive tables to compare effects on
different states, and a variety of additional
resources.
|