Management Of Neck Pain

Tai Q. Nguyen, M.D.
Tai Q. Nguyen, M.D. is Associate Professor of Neurosurgery at the
University of Florida Health Science Center / Jacksonville.

Introduction

Neck pain is a ubiquitous and recurring symptom that is usually of short duration and does not require medical attention. When neck pain is persistent enough to prompt a visit to the doctor, it deserves a systematic physical examination to determine the presence of structural damage and/or neural involvement.

History And Physical Examination

A history of trauma is important to determine at the initial visit, including its relation to the onset of neck pain, for diagnostic as well as for medico-legal purposes. The exact location of the pain, whether it is associated with shoulder and/or arm pain and paresthesia, and whether there is limitation of the range of motion of the neck or the shoulders are factors that will help in the differential diagnosis. When the pain involves both neck and shoulder, it is important to determine whether the pain comes primarily from the neck, the shoulder or both. Severe pain with muscle spasm may limit the range of motion of the neck or the shoulders, but this limitation can be overcome, with encouragement, by the patient. Real limitation of the range of motion of the neck or the shoulders indicates the presence of structural damages within the corresponding joints. A neurological examination will determine the presence or absence of myelopathy and nerve root dysfunction. Signs that suggest the presence of a radiculopathy: a focal muscle weakness or decreased sensation in the distribution of a cervical nerve root; a paresthesia affecting one or two digits of one hand; a decrease or absence of a deep tendon reflex. Myelopathy is denoted by hyperreflexia, the presence of clonus or a Babinski sign, spasticity of the lower extremities, sensory loss and disturbance in bladder function. The emotional condition of the patient should also be assessed as part of the initial examination to determine psychological factors that might contribute to the experience of pain.1

Differential Diagnosis

Neck pain may arise from affections of the cervical musculature or the cervical vertebral column and its surrounding neurovascular structures or from diseases of other organs with pain irradiation to the neck. A number of diseases presenting with neck pain require immediate intervention: myocardial infarction and aortic dissection where the pain is more typically located in the anterior neck, throat or tongue and the range of motion of the neck is not compromised; meningeal irritation from infection or subarachnoid hemorrhage, causing neck stiffness; severe arterial hypertension, where the pain is usually suboccipital.2

Degenerative changes in cervical spines are visible radiographically in 40% of the adult population and its frequency can reach 90% by the age of 603. Degenerative changes are most frequently observed in the C5-6 and C6-7 discs. The disc narrows as nuclear material desiccates, and osteophytes develop at the outer margins of the bony end-plate. These bony spurs can encroach on the cervical spinal canal and the neural foramen, causing compression of the spinal cord and the nerve roots, and more rarely the vertebral arteries. Degeneration of the facet joints often accompanies disc degeneration. The joint of Luschka are similarly involved.

Fracture of vertebrae, disruption of ligaments, dislocation of joints and ruptures of intervertebral discs may be seen after falls or traffic accidents. These injuries may or may not cause neural injuries, and may not even cause enough pain at the initial visit to the emergency room so that they may be missed by a cursory examination. When the nature of the accident is such that a severe injury to the cervical spine is suspected, a careful radiographic investigation must be conducted, with review by an experienced radiologist of the complete series of plain radiographs of the spine, supplemented if necessary by CT scan of the suspected region. Tumoral and infectious processes may have an insidious or an acute onset. Although rare, the possibility of tumor must be considered in the differential diagnosis of persistent neck pain, with or without neurological symptoms.

Diagnostic Studies

Imaging studies

Plain radiography of the cervical spine is indicated when there is suspicion of traumatic injuries (fracture, dislocation), or a tumoral or infectious process. Dynamic studies (lateral views with flexion and extension of the cervical spine) may be performed in patients without neurological deficits to demonstrate spinal instability when a spinal injury is suspected and routine cervical-spine series is negative. CT scan of the spine will show linear fractures of the vertebrae where plain radiographs may not be able to detect. It also allows the assessment of the spinal canal (spinal canal stenosis) and the neural foramen (neural foramen narrowing). For the diagnosis of intervertebral disc rupture and herniation, or intraspinal soft tissue processes (such as epidural and intradural abscesses and hematomas, intraspinal tumors), MRI scanning is an excellent tool because it gives a better definition of soft tissues. Myelogram and CT scan with intrathecal contract are still useful in the surgical planning because they allow the best visualization of the relationship between the bony structures and the neural tissues. When all other imaging studies fail to produce an anatomical explanation for the patient's symptoms, provocative discography has been advocated to produce the precipitation or exacerbation of the very symptoms that cause the patient to seek medical attention. Discography has also been shown to demonstrate disc annular tears when MRI scanning was negative.4 Even in experienced hands, the incidence of complication is still significant,5 and with the questionable value of its efficacy in identifying the site of the cervical symptomatology,6 discography is not a routine diagnostic procedure.

Nerve blocks

Nerve blocks for the diagnosis of cervical joint pain have been used with some success,7 and should be done carefully in a double-blind manner.

Electrodiagnostic studies

Electromyography and nerve conduction velocity tests are helpful in confirming cervical radiculopathies when the presence of a peripheral neuropathy compounds the symptoms. The absence of abnormal electrodiagnostic findings does not however rule out a radiculopathy.

Etiologies

Identifiable etiologies of neck pain include: Chronic inflammatory processes, such as rheumatoid arthritis; tumors of the spine (primary or metastatic), or tumors of the neural structures (spinal cord tumors: astrocytomas or ependymomas) or of their coverings (meningiomas, also metastatic tumors); infectious processes such as osteomyelitis, epidural or subdural abscesses; intervertebral disc herniation or prominent spondylotic spurs causing spinal cord and/or nerve root compression.

Unless the symptoms are typical of a radiculopathy or radiographic investigations reveal an acute traumatic, tumoral or infectious process, it is often times difficult to ascribe neck pain to a particular anatomical abnormality. Ligamental tenderness and muscle spasm may be the result of direct injuries but may also be secondary to referred pain. Degenerative changes in the cervical spine are so prevalent that the presence of such abnormalities cannot be taken as prima facie evidence of their causality. In a study of individuals between 20 and 65 years of age, disc degeneration was associated with neck pain in men but not in women. Osteoarthritis was not related to neck pain, either in the men or in the women. The presence of degenerative changes on the cervical spine radiographs therefore does not indicate the etiology of the neck pain. Neuroticism was found to be a more powerful determinant of neck pain than radiological signs of disc degeneration or osteoarthritis in the general population.8 Recurrent neck pain with intermittent symptoms of cervical nerve root irritation however has been attributed to recurrent inflammation of the facet joints or the uncovertebral joints, causing transient irritation of the nerve roots.

Management Of Neck Pain

The management of neck pain without an obvious identifiable cause is therefore best treated conservatively. Narcotic analgesics may be used but only for a short period of time. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents often offer significant relief.

The effectiveness of physical therapy in reducing neck pain has been and still is a subject of debate. At best, physical therapy provides a degree of short-term pain relief, and encourages the patient to resume the normal motion of the neck. In acute neck pain after road traffic accidents, a home exercise program has been shown to be as effective in reducing pain and improve cervical movements as outpatient physiotherapy.9 Moist heat and gentle massage done at home with help from a family member, may be palliative and therefore advised. Cervical traction has been used as a form of physical therapy for neck pain. It may reduce pain during its application and for a short period thereafter. Its efficacy in affecting the likelihood and the rate of improvement is still under question. Soft collars often provided some comfort to the patient with neck pain and are therefore often prescribed, although their benefit has not been statistically proven.10 Manipulation of the spine may give short-term benefits for some patients with neck pain. Although the rate of complications of cervical manipulation has been shown to be small, 11 the potential of permanent impairment or death makes its risks outweigh its possible benefits. Acupuncture as an alternative modality of treatment of neck pain has not yet been studied on a large scale to assess its effectiveness in shortening the period of recovery or the rate of permanent pain relief.

Neck pain is a frequent complaint after motor vehicle accidents, especially after rear-end collisions. The pain may not be experienced immediately, but sometime later when neck motion precipitates muscle spasm. Sixty-two percents of patients attending hospital following road traffic accidents state that they have suffered pain in the neck at some time following their accident, compared with 31% who were noted to have neck pain when examined soon after the accident.12 The majority of neck pain after traffic accidents subsides however, and in one study of over 200 individuals where medico-legal implications are not relevant, the prevalence of chronic symptoms are not higher than in the general population. Expectation of disability, a family history and attribution of pre-existing symptoms to the trauma are important determinants for the chronicity of the neck pain.13 The outcome of acute neck pain after traffic accidents is better for patients who are encouraged to continue to engage in their normal activities as usual than for patients who are given sick leave and immobilized in a soft collar during the first 14 days after the accident.14

Surgical Treatment

Neck pain will benefit from surgical treatments when it is due either to neural compression and/or spinal instability. Radicular pain will be relieved by decompression of the nerve root(s) involved. Instability is corrected by reduction and fusion of the involved vertebrae. Decompression of the nerve root may be accomplished via a posterior laminotomy and foraminotomy, or an anterior discectomy with or without fusion of the vertebral bodies. Oftentimes, a fusion is necessary to re-establish the spinal stability or to prevent a future deformity due to the weakening of the supportive structure after the decompression. Controversy still surrounds the indications for operating on degenerated discs without demonstrated neural compression. A recent study showed that surgical fusion of cervical discs may bring relief of neck pain to a certain number of selected cases. Only in cases in which radiographic changes correlate with the results of diagnostic nerve blocks should surgical fusion be considered as a last therapeutic means to resolve the painful condition.

A Case Presentation

The patient was a 35-year old woman who presented with complaints of posterior neck pain, right shoulder and arm pain, and occasional paresthesia in the right arm and in the first two digits of the right hand. The patient dated the onset of her symptoms to a motor vehicle accident occurring one year before, when her car, which was stationary, was hit head-on by another car. There was however no pending litigation. The pain had gotten more intense and more frequent over the previous few months, with an intensity of 7 over 10 on a 0 to 10 scale. It affected the patient's sleep and required acetaminophen with codeine for pain control. Past medical history was remarkable for hypothyroidism. Review of systems was otherwise negative. The patient smoked a pack of cigarettes a day for the previous 20 years and consumed alcohol moderately. The patient had undergone physical therapy three times a week for 6 weeks with transient pain relief. She had continued to work as a computer operator. She was single and had 3 children. Physical examination was remarkable for an increase in pain in the posterior aspect of the neck going down the spine on neck flexion. Shoulder movements were not limited and did not elicit any discomfort. Motor examination revealed a weakness of the right elbow flexion of 4 over 5 on a 0 to 5 scale. Sensory examination showed a decreased sensation to touch and pinprick over the C6 dermatome distribution. Deep tendon reflexes were symmetrical. There were no pathological reflexes. The rest of the neurological examination was negative. Plain radiographs of the cervical spine showed degenerative disc disease at the C5-6 level with a 2-mm retrolisthesis of C5 vertebra on C6 (Figure 1). MRI scan subsequently revealed an intervertebral disc herniation at C5-6 on the right side, compressing the right C6 nerve root (Figure 2). Because the patient had persistent and severe pain, a surgical decompression by anterior discectomy and interbody fusion with allograft was recommended to relieve the pressure off the C6 nerve root and to prevent compression of the spinal cord. The patient was asked to stop smoking.15 She underwent the operation without complications. Post-operative radiographs of the cervical spine showed good fusion at the graft site (Figure 3). The neck and arm pain subsided completely. Muscle strength returned to normal. The patient resumed her occupation without any problem.

neckfig1.jpg (5202 bytes) neckfig2.jpg (10433 bytes)

Figure 1 (Left). Pre-operative lateral plane radiograph of the cervical spine, showing degenerative disc disease at C5-6 level, with posterior bony spurs and a 2-mm retrolisthesis of C5 vertebra on C6. Figure 2 (Center). MRI scan with axial view at the level of C5-6 disc, showing right paracentral disc protrusion, with large asymmetric right dorsal osteophytic spurring inducing encroachment on the right C5-6 neural foramen and stretching of the right C6 nerve root. Figure 3 (Right). Post-operative lateral plane radiograph of the cervical spine showing fusion at the graft site.

neckfig3.jpg (5204 bytes)

Conclusion

Neck pain without evidence of acute structural damage and without neural compression is best treated with reassurance, non-narcotic analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication. The patients (including those with post-traumatic neck pain) should be also encouraged to maintain or resume normal neck motion with a home program of exercises and physical therapy. A soft cervical collar should be used only for a short period of time to allow the patient to initiate the above recommended measures. When acute structural damages to the spine or an infection are suspected, imaging studies are warranted. Degenerative changes will be seen on most plain radiographs of patients of over 30 years of age and are of limited value in the differential diagnosis. In patients with acute structural damage caused by trauma or an infectious / inflammatory or tumoral process, and those with compressive myelopathy and/or radiculopathy confirmed by diagnostic studies, surgical intervention is warranted. Therefore, the initial investigation should be aimed at distinguishing these two groups. Early assessment of the emotional make-up of the patient will help to avoid unnecessary diagnostic and surgical procedures.

References

  1. Oosterhuis WW. Early screening of pain to prevent it from becoming intractable. Pain. 1984; 20: 193-200.
  2. Hadler NM. Medical management of the regional musculoskeletal diseases. Grune & Stratton, Inc., Orlando, FL, 1984. p.84.
  3. Lawrence JS. Disc degeneration: Its frequency and relationship to symptoms. Ann Rheum Dis. 1969; 28:121-137.
  4. Zeidman SM, Thompson K, Ducker TB. Complications of cervical discography: analysis of 4400 diagnostic disc injections. Neurosurgery. 1995;37:414-7.
  5. Shinomiya K, Nakao K, Shindoh S, et al. Evaluation of cervical diskography in pain origin and provocation. J Spinal Disord. 1993; 6:422-6.
  6. Barnsley L, Bogduk N. Medial branch blocks are specific for the diagnosis of cervical zygapophyseal joint pain. Reg Anesth. 1993; 18:343-50.
  7. van der Donk J, Schouten JS, Passchier J, et al. The associations of neck pain with radiological abnormalities of the cervical spine and personality traits in a general population. J Rheumotol. 1991; 18: 1884-9.
  8. McKinney LA, Doman JO, Ryan M. The role of physiotherapy in the management of acute road-traffic accident. Arch Emer Med. 1989; 6:27-33.
  9. British Association of Physical Medicine. Pain in the neck and arm: A multi-center trial of the effects of physiotherapy. Br Med J. 1966; 1:253-58.
  10. Hurtwiz EL, Aker PD, Adams AH, et al. Manipulation and mobilization of the cervical spine. A systematic review of the literature. Spine. 1996; 21:1746-59.
  11. Dean GT, Maggalliard JN, Kerr M, et al. Neck sprain—a major cause of disability following car accidents. Injury. 1987; 18:10-2.
  12. Schrader H, Obelieniene D, Bovimm G, et al. Natural evolution of late whiplash syndrome outside the medicolegal context. Lancet. 1996; 347:1207-11.
  13. Borchegrevink GE, Kaasa A, McDonald D, et al. Acute treatment of whiplash neck sprain injuries. A randomized trial of treatment during the first 14 days after a car accident. Spine. 1998; 23: 25-31.
  14. Hadley MN, Reddy SV. Smoking and the human vertebral column: a review of the impact    of cigarette use on vertebral bone metabolism and spinal fusion. Neurosurgery. 1997; 41:116-24.
Jacksonville Medicine / June, 1999

What's New · Northeast Florida Medicine Journal · Know Your Physician · Legal & Legislative
·
DCMS Alliance · Academy of Medicine · Member Websites · Community Health
About the DCMS · Meetings Calendar · Member Benefits · Employment Connection · Home

Duval County Medical Society   ·   555 Bishopgate Lane  ·   Jacksonville, FL  32204
Phone: (904) 355-6561 
  ·     FAX:  (904) 353-5848   
General Email: dcms@dcmsonline.org 
  ·   Webmaster's Email: mdoran@dcmsonline.org
Privacy Policy and Disclaimers