
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>News &amp; Press</title>
<link>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/default.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[  Read about recent events, essential information and the latest community news.  ]]></description>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 6 Jun 2026 15:41:42 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Dec 2025 17:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2025 Duval County Medical Society</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news_rss.asp?cat=11737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Oversight Sought of AI in Insurance</title>
<link>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=715765</link>
<guid>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=715765</guid>
<description><![CDATA[©2025 <a href="https://www.newsserviceflorida.com/latest/headlines/oversight-sought-of-ai-in-insurance/article_4659137e-132e-4cee-8b53-db3d1fc99356.html" target="_blank">The News Service of Florida</a><br />By Jim Saunders<br /><br />TALLAHASSEE — As Florida lawmakers dig into issues involving artificial intelligence, state Insurance Commissioner Michael Yaworsky wants to make sure regulators can properly oversee AI use by insurance companies.<br /><br />“Responsible AI governance is crucial,” Yaworsky told the Senate Banking and Insurance Committee last week. “I’m not an opponent of AI, but I do think it needs to be responsibly deployed. There are some companies that I think are doing it in a much more responsible manner than others.”<br /><br />Rep. Hillary Cassel, R-Dania Beach, filed a bill (HB 527) on Monday that seeks to ensure humans make decisions about denials of insurance claims. Cassel’s bill is identical to a measure (SB 202) filed in October by Sen. Jennifer Bradley, R-Fleming Island.<br /><br />Yaworsky did not go that far last week when outlining his ideas to the Senate committee. He said he wants to address issues such as disclosure when artificial intelligence is being used, auditing and understanding that companies have a “human in the loop that knows what that system is doing, has expertise on that.”<br /><br />“This is a policy decision for the Legislature,” Yaworsky said. “We don’t view it as a necessary benefit to eliminate the use of AI. That’s a legislative decision to make. But we do want to provide a path where, if it is being used, it is being used responsibly, known to the regulator.”<br /><br />With the explosive growth of artificial intelligence, lawmakers have started looking at the technology in subject areas such as insurance and education. House Speaker Daniel Perez, R-Miami, sent a memorandum last week to lawmakers saying the week of Dec. 8 to Dec. 12 will be “Artificial Intelligence Week” in the House, with subcommittees focusing on AI issues in the areas they oversee.<br /><br />“We all recognize that AI may open new economic vistas,” Perez wrote in the memo. “At the same time, we see stories about how AI can be abused, have adverse effects on education, or harm emotionally vulnerable users. As policy makers, our understanding of the issue is complicated by the rapid emergence of this complex technology, and, as we’ve seen with social media, short-term legislative choices can have serious long-term consequences.”<br /><br />The House Insurance &amp; Banking Subcommittee in October held a panel discussion about artificial intelligence, with a panel of insurance and tech officials saying insurers are using artificial intelligence in a variety of ways, including in claims handling. The panel members also tried to dispel concerns that the technology could be misused.<br /><br />Paul Martin, vice president of state affairs for the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies, told the House panel that AI is a “tool” whose use is governed by already-existing insurance laws.<br /><br />“If a practice is prohibited for a human to do on behalf of an insurance company, it is prohibited for AI to do,” Martin said. “Artificial intelligence is not an end run for the insurance companies around a state’s statutes or its regulations.”<br /><br />But during his appearance last week at the Senate committee, Yaworsky said regulators recently flagged a filing by a company that had used an “off-the-shelf solution.”<br /><br />“I won’t name the company, but a while back, from a health company we got a filing, and our actuaries, as they looked it, they were smart enough to know that AI was involved,” Yaworsky said. “When we asked the company, ‘Well, what does this AI mechanism do?’ Their response was, ‘We don’t know.’”]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Dec 2025 18:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Government Shutdown: We Want To Hear From You</title>
<link>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=713247</link>
<guid>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=713247</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="https://www.dcmsonline.org/resource/resmgr/images/headers/advocatingphysicians.png" style="width: 100%; height: 32%;" /></p>
<p><br /><span style="font-size: 16px;">The Duval County Medical Society Board of Directors want to hear from you: <strong>how is the government shutdown impacting your ability to practice?</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please <a href="https://form.jotform.com/252994656556172" target="_blank">fill out our brief form</a> to provide feedback on the impact and your experience.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 16px;">&nbsp;</span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>New Medicare Claims Guidance from CMS</title>
<link>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=712896</link>
<guid>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=712896</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">A message from the American Medical Association:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Today, the Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services (CMS) updated its Medicare claims hold guidance to Medicare Administrative Contractors, which is copied below. The AMA had been communicating with CMS behind the scenes and urging the agency to clarify its <a href="https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/fee-for-service-providers" target="_blank">guidance</a> in light of significant confusion about which claims are being paid during the ongoing federal government shutdown.
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">
 

<br />“CMS instructed all Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) to lift the claims hold and process claims with dates of service of October 1, 2025, and later for certain services impacted by select expired Medicare legislative payment provisions passed under the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025 (Pub. L. 119-4, Mar. 15, 2025).  This includes claims paid under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, ground ambulance transport claims, and Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) claims.  This includes telehealth claims that CMS can confirm are definitively for behavioral and mental health services.  CMS has directed all MACs to continue to temporarily hold claims for other telehealth services (i.e. those that CMS cannot confirm are definitively for behavioral and mental health services) and for acute Hospital Care at Home claims. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">

 

Beginning October 1, 2025, for services that are not behavioral health services, many of the statutory limitations on payment for Medicare telehealth services that were, in response to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency, lifted, and subsequently extended, through legislation again took effect. These include prohibition of many services provided to beneficiaries in their homes and outside of rural areas, and hospice recertifications that require a face-to-face encounter. In the absence of Congressional action, practitioners who choose to perform telehealth services that are not payable by Medicare on or after October 1, 2025, may want to evaluate providing beneficiaries with an <a href="https://www.cms.gov/medicare/forms-notices/beneficiary-notices-initiative/ffs-abn" target="_blank">Advance Beneficiary Notice of Noncoverage</a> (ABN). Further information on use of the ABN, including ABN forms and form instructions can be found here: <a href="https://www.cms.gov/medicare/forms-notices/beneficiary-notices-initiative/ffs-abn" target="_blank">https://www.cms.gov/medicare/forms-notices/beneficiary-notices-initiative/ffs-abn</a>. Practitioners should monitor Congressional action and may choose to hold claims associated with telehealth services that are currently not payable by Medicare in the absence of Congressional action. For further information: <a href="https://www.cms.gov/medicare/coverage/telehealth" target="_blank">https://www.cms.gov/medicare/coverage/telehealth</a>.
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">
 

CMS notes that the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (Pub. L. 115-123, Feb. 9, 2018), which added section 1899(l) to the Social Security Act, allows clinicians in applicable Medicare Shared Savings Program Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) to provide and receive payment for covered telehealth services to certain Medicare beneficiaries without geographic restrictions and in the beneficiary’s home. Separate from requirements to participate in the Medicare Shared Savings Program, there is no special application or approval process for applicable ACOs or their ACO participants or ACO providers/suppliers to offer these covered telehealth services. Clinicians in applicable ACOs can furnish and receive payment for covered telehealth services under these special telehealth flexibilities. For clinicians in applicable ACOs, telehealth claims that CMS can confirm are definitively for behavioral and mental health services will be paid. At this time, claims for some telehealth services will continue to be held.  For more information, including information on to which ACOs these flexibilities apply: <a href="https://www.cms.gov/files/document/shared-savings-program-telehealth-fact-sheet.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.cms.gov/files/document/shared-savings-program-telehealth-fact-sheet.pdf (PDF)</a>.”</span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2025 22:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Updated Guidance on Claims Amid Government Shutdown</title>
<link>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=712547</link>
<guid>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=712547</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><em style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; background-color: #ffffff;">The following is an official release from the CMS Medicare Learning Network®:</em></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 16px; color: #000000;"><strong><br />Claims Hold Update
</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">In anticipation of possible Congressional action, CMS has instructed all Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) to continue to temporarily hold claims with dates of service of October 1, 2025, and later for services impacted by the expired Medicare legislative payment provisions passed under the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025. This includes all claims paid under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, ground ambulance transport claims, and all Federally Qualified Health Center claims. Providers may continue to submit these claims, but payment will not be released until the hold is lifted.
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">
Absent Congressional action, beginning October 1, 2025, many of the statutory limitations that were in place for Medicare telehealth services prior to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency took effect again for services that are not behavioral health services. These include prohibition of many services provided to beneficiaries in their homes and outside of rural areas, and hospice recertifications that require a face-to-face encounter. In the absence of Congressional action, practitioners who choose to perform telehealth services that are not payable by Medicare on or after October 1, 2025, may want to evaluate providing beneficiaries with an Advance Beneficiary Notice of Noncoverage (ABN). Further information on use of the ABN, including ABN forms and form instructions: <a href="https://www.cms.gov/medicare/forms-notices/beneficiary-notices-initiative/ffs-abn" target="_blank">https://www.cms.gov/medicare/forms-notices/beneficiary-notices-initiative/ffs-abn</a>. Practitioners should monitor Congressional action and may choose to hold claims associated with telehealth services that are not payable by Medicare in the absence of Congressional action. For further information: <a href="https://www.cms.gov/medicare/coverage/telehealth" target="_blank">https://www.cms.gov/medicare/coverage/telehealth</a>.
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">
CMS notes that the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 allows clinicians in applicable Medicare Shared Savings Program Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) to provide and receive payment for covered telehealth services to certain Medicare beneficiaries without geographic restriction and in the beneficiary’s home. There is no special application or approval process for applicable ACOs or their ACO participants or ACO providers/suppliers. Clinicians in applicable ACOs can furnish and receive payment for covered telehealth services under these special telehealth flexibilities. For more information: 

<a href="https://www.cms.gov/files/document/shared-savings-program-telehealth-fact-sheet.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.cms.gov/files/document/shared-savings-program-telehealth-fact-sheet.pdf (PDF)</a>.
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 16px; color: #000000;">
 

<strong><br />Claims, Pricers &amp; Codes</strong>
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><strong>NCCI Alert: COVID-19 Vaccine Administration Edit Revision</strong>
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">Some providers may have 90480 claims denied when billed in conjunction with G0008, G0009, or G0010 as a result of a Procedure to Procedure edit released in the 2025 Quarter 4 National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) files. On October 14, 2025, CMS issued replacement NCCI files to remove this edit. Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) will reprocess claims with dates of service between July 1, 2025, and October 15, 2025, within approximately 30 business days, and Medicare providers don’t need to take any action. Alternatively, a provider may also choose to use the MAC appeals process if they don’t wish to wait for the automatic adjustment to occur, or they can wait to submit impacted claims until after CMS implements the change.
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;">
Access the <a href="https://www.cms.gov/medicare/coding-billing/ncci-medicare" target="_blank">Medicare replacement files</a>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000;"><em style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; background-color: #ffffff;"><br />The full message was posted by CMS&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cms.gov/training-education/medicare-learning-network/newsletter/mln-connects-newsletter-october-15-2025#_Toc211414158" target="_blank" style="box-sizing: border-box; background-color: transparent; transition-property: all;">here</a>.</em></span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 22:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Higher Liability Limits Sought</title>
<link>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=712269</link>
<guid>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=712269</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">The News Service of Florida<br />by NSF Staff<br /><br />After a similar proposal died this spring in the Senate, a House Republican on Friday renewed a push to pass a bill that would lead to cities, counties and other government agencies paying more in lawsuits over people getting injured. Rep. Fiona McFarland, R-Sarasota, filed a bill (HB 145) that would revamp the state’s sovereign-immunity laws, which help shield government agencies from costly lawsuits. Under a law passed in 2010, government agencies’ liability in such cases is capped at $200,000 for payments to a single person and $300,000 if multiple people are involved in an incident, though the caps can be exceeded if lawmakers pass a special type of measure known as a “claim” bill. Under McFarland’s proposal, those limits would go to $500,000 and $1 million for injuries that occur on or after Oct. 1, 2026, and $600,000 and $1.2 million for injuries that occur on or after Oct. 1, 2031. The bill could lead to higher costs for government agencies, but McFarland has long argued that changes are needed to sovereign-immunity laws to help victims get justice for injuries. The House voted 103-11 to pass the similar bill during the 2025 legislative session, but the Senate did not take up the issue. McFarland’s new bill will be considered during the 2026 session, which will start in January.</span></span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 14:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>AI in Insurance Eyed</title>
<link>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=711547</link>
<guid>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=711547</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">The News Service of Florida<br />by NSF Staff<br /><br />A House panel next week will hold a discussion about use of artificial intelligence in the insurance industry, after lawmakers during the 2025 session considered placing restrictions on AI in claims handling. The House Insurance &amp; Banking Subcommittee is scheduled Tuesday to take up the issue. The House and Senate during the 2025 session considered bills that would have prevented insurers from using artificial intelligence as the sole basis for denying claims. The bills did not pass. House and Senate panels will start meeting Tuesday as lawmakers prepare for the 2026 session, which will start in January.</span></span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Oct 2025 15:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Malpractice Bill to Come Back in 2026</title>
<link>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=703037</link>
<guid>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=703037</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">The News Service of Florida<br />by NSF Staff<br /><br />House Speaker Daniel Perez, R-Miami, said Thursday the House in 2026 will again consider a proposal intended to clear the way for some people to pursue medical-malpractice lawsuits over the deaths of family members. Perez made the comment after Gov. Ron DeSantis last week vetoed a bill (HB 6017) that passed the Legislature this spring, arguing it could “open floodgates” for litigation. The bill would have repealed a long-controversial 1990 law that prevents people ages 25 and older from seeking what are known as “non-economic” damages in medical-malpractice cases involving deaths of their parents. Also, under the law, parents cannot seek such damages in malpractice cases involving the deaths of their children who are 25 or older. Perez said the goal of the bill is to hold physicians accountable for negligence and argued that people should not be treated differently in malpractice cases based on their family situations. Business and health-care groups fought the bill, contending it would lead to higher malpractice-insurance costs and could lead to physicians deciding against practicing in Florida.</span></span>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jun 2025 12:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>DeSantis Vetoes Malpractice Bill</title>
<link>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=702440</link>
<guid>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=702440</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">The News Service of Florida<br />by NSF Staff<br /><br />Gov. Ron DeSantis on Thursday vetoed a bill aimed at clearing the way for some people to pursue medical-malpractice lawsuits over the deaths of family members. DeSantis, who earlier had indicated he would veto the bill (HB 6017), said during an appearance at Gulf Coast Medical Center in Fort Myers that the proposal could “open flood gates” for litigation. The bill would have repealed a long-controversial 1990 law that prevents people ages 25 and older from seeking what are known as “non-economic” damages in medical-malpractice cases involving deaths of their parents. Also, under the law, parents cannot seek such damages in malpractice cases involving the deaths of their children who are 25 or older. People who allege their family members were killed by malpractice supported the bill throughout this year’s legislative session, arguing that doctors and other health providers are not being held accountable. </span></span></p><p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">But health-care and business groups lobbied against the bill, contending it would drive up malpractice insurance costs and lead to doctors deciding not to practice in Florida. Those groups and DeSantis argued that a repeal of the 1990 law would need to be coupled with broader caps on non-economic damages in malpractice lawsuits. “If you don't have those caps, then you really are incentivizing a lot more litigation to take place in the state of Florida,” DeSantis said. “None of that is free lunch. Somebody will have to pay for it. And unfortunately, I think if this bill became law, I do think the cost would be borne by the physicians, who would potentially flee the state, to people that wouldn't have as much access to care.” Malpractice damage caps have been a political lightning-rod issue for decades, with plaintiffs’ attorneys fighting them. The Senate on May 1 voted 33-4 to pass the bill after narrowly rejecting an amendment to include caps. The House earlier approved the measure in a 104-6 vote.</span></span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 16:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>DeSantis to Veto Medical Malpractice Bill</title>
<link>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=701275</link>
<guid>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=701275</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">The News Service of Florida<br />by NSF Staff<br /><br />Gov. Ron DeSantis said Thursday he will veto a bill that seeks to expand lawsuits by some people pursuing medical-malpractice claims involving the deaths of family members. DeSantis said the proposal (HB 6017) to repeal a long-controversial 1990 law will cause insurance premiums to “skyrocket” by allowing people to expand economic damage claims to include non-economic damages. “What that is going to do, is that's going to lead to a flood of lawsuits against practitioners, against hospitals. Malpractice premiums are going to go up,” DeSantis said during an event in Dade City. DeSantis said he relied upon input from people at health care hospitals and physicians. “It was pretty overwhelming in terms of the concern,” DeSantis said. </span></span></p><p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">Under the 1990 law, people who are 25 years old or older cannot seek what are known as “non-economic” damages in medical-malpractice cases involving deaths of their parents. Also, parents cannot seek such damages in malpractice cases involving the deaths of their children who are 25 or older. The bill, which the governor has not received yet, was strongly supported during the 2025 legislative session by people who allege their family members were killed by medical malpractice. Health-care and business groups have lobbied against it. Lawmakers could revisit the issue, as DeSantis suggested putting limits on monetary awards. “What I suggested that was done — I know there was some support for it in the Senate — is that if you had caps on the amount of damages, people could see that and would disincentivize a lot of jackpot justice,” DeSantis said. Damage caps have been a lightning-rod issue for decades, with health-care groups backing such limits and plaintiffs’ attorneys fighting them. </span></span></p><p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">Supporters of the repeal have said the law prevents people from getting justice for deaths caused by medical malpractice. “This is a 35-year-old law that needs to be repealed. … It’s unjust. It shouldn’t be on the books,” Senate bill sponsor Clay Yarborough, R-Jacksonville, said before the Senate voted 33-4 to pass the bill on May 1. The House approved the measure in a 104-6 vote on March 26.</span></span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 13:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Medical Malpractice Bill Revived, Passes</title>
<link>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=700130</link>
<guid>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=700130</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">The News Service of Florida<br />by Jim Saunders<br /><br />TALLAHASSEE — A day after the issue appeared stalled, the Florida Senate on Thursday gave final approval to a bill that would open the door to some people pursuing medical-malpractice lawsuits over the deaths of family members.<br /><br />The Senate voted 33-4 to pass the bill, which would repeal a long-controversial 1990 law. The House passed the bill (HB 6017) in late March, meaning it is now ready to go to Gov. Ron DeSantis.<br /><br />Under the 1990 law, people who are 25 years old or older cannot seek what are known as “non-economic” damages in medical-malpractice cases involving deaths of their parents. Also, parents cannot seek such damages in malpractice cases involving the deaths of their children who are 25 or older.<br /><br />Supporters of the repeal have said the law prevents people from getting justice for deaths caused by medical malpractice.<br /><br />“This is a 35-year-old law that needs to be repealed,” Senate bill sponsor Clay Yarborough, R-Jacksonville, said Thursday. “It’s unjust. It shouldn’t be on the books.”<br /><br />But opponents argued, in part, that a repeal would drive up medical-malpractice insurance premiums, exacerbating problems with physician shortages in the state.<br /><br />“We are going to create even more of a problem in the state of Florida,” Sen. Gayle Harrell, R-Stuart, said.<br /><br />Along with Harrell, the bill drew opposition from Sen. Tom Leek, R-Ormond Beach; Sen. Stan McClain, R-Ocala, and Sen. Keith Truenow, R-Tavares.<br /><br />The vote came a day after the bill appeared to be stalled in the Senate following a fierce debate and procedural moves. That included a failed attempt to change the bill to add a $1 million cap on non-economic — often known as “pain and suffering” — damages in all medical malpractice lawsuits involving patient deaths.<br /><br />Damage caps have been a lightning-rod issue for decades, with health-care groups backing such limits and plaintiffs’ attorneys fighting them. Yarborough said the proposed change would have brought “balance” to the bill.<br /><br />After senators voted 19-18 to reject the proposed addition, Yarborough tabled the bill, leaving it unclear whether it would be considered again. But the Senate on Thursday took up the bill without the change and overwhelmingly passed it.<br /><br />As a sign of the intensity of the issue, Harrell said a billboard had been put up in front of her neighborhood that attacked her as supporting “profits over people.”<br /><br />“I can tell you that is very devastating to anyone in a political situation where they think Gayle Harrell puts profits over people,” Harrell, whose late husband was a physician, said. “I do not. I do not.”<br /><br />Other senators rallied to Harrell’s defense. Yarborough said there’s “no excuse” for the billboard.<br /><br />“I think it’s sick,” Yarborough said. “It’s cowardly. It’s immature.”</span></span>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 May 2025 13:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Medical Malpractice Proposal Put on Hold</title>
<link>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=700039</link>
<guid>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=700039</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">The News Service of Florida<br />by Jim Saunders<br /><br />TALLAHASSEE — In 1990, Florida lawmakers included an exception in the state’s medical-malpractice laws that prevented a narrow group of people from pursuing key damages in lawsuits over the deaths of family members.<br /><br />And after years of debate, the Florida Senate appeared on the verge Wednesday of passing a bill to repeal the exception.<br /><br />But Senate sponsor Clay Yarborough, R-Jacksonville, tabled the bill, leaving unclear whether lawmakers will address the issue in the remaining days of the legislative session.<br /><br />Yarborough’s move came after the House voted 104-6 last month to pass the bill (HB 6017) — and after the Senate, following a fierce debate Wednesday, voted 19-18 to defeat a proposal that would have made a major change to the bill.<br /><br />People who allege their family members were killed by medical malpractice have lobbied heavily for the bill during this year’s legislative session. Health-care and business groups have lobbied against it.<br /><br />Under the 1990 law, people who are 25 years old or older cannot seek what are known as “non-economic” damages in medical-malpractice cases involving deaths of their parents. Also, parents cannot seek such damages in malpractice cases involving the deaths of their children who are 25 or older.<br /><br />Sen. Darryl Rouson, a St. Petersburg Democrat and attorney who supports the repeal bill, said families “have come to Tallahassee for the last 35 years seeking justice, seeking fairness.”<br /><br />But Sen. Gayle Harrell, R-Stuart, argued the bill would lead to higher medical-malpractice insurance premiums, exacerbating problems of shortages of physicians in areas such as obstetrics and gynecology.<br /><br />“This is going to create a major problem for the state of Florida,” said Harrell, whose late husband was a physician.<br /><br />Yarborough, who has supported repealing the law, did not give an explanation when he tabled the bill. He later said he wanted to “continue to work on details related to the bill."<br /><br />But the move came after the Senate voted 19-18 to reject a proposed addition to the bill that would have placed a $1 million cap on non-economic — often known as “pain and suffering” — damages in all medical malpractice lawsuits involving patient deaths.<br /><br />Damage caps have been a lightning-rod issue for decades, with health-care groups backing such limits and plaintiffs’ attorneys fighting them. Yarborough said the proposed addition would bring “balance” to the bill.<br /><br />But Sen. Erin Grall, R-Vero Beach, described the cap proposal as lawmakers giving the “biggest gift of the year” to medical-malpractice insurers and said juries should determine losses in such cases.<br /><br />“Caps, to me, are the antithesis of accountability,” Grall, an attorney, said.</span></span>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2025 13:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>House to Take Up Med Mal Change</title>
<link>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=696780</link>
<guid>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=696780</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">The News Service of Florida<br />by NSF Staff<br /><br />The Florida House is scheduled Wednesday to take up a proposal that would change a decades-old law and clear the way for more medical-malpractice lawsuits over patient deaths. The proposal (HB 6017), filed by Rep. Dana Trabulsy, R-Fort Pierce, and Rep. Johanna Lopez, D-Orlando, has sparked a lobbying battle, with plaintiffs’ attorneys and the senior-advocacy group AARP backing it and health-care and business groups opposing it. The bill would undo part of a 1990 law that involves wrongful-death lawsuits and what are known as “non-economic” damages for such things as pain and suffering. That part of the law prevents people from seeking non-economic damages in certain circumstances. People who are 25 years old or older cannot seek such damages in medical-malpractice cases involving deaths of their parents. Also, parents cannot seek such damages in malpractice cases involving the deaths of their children who are 25 or older. Supporters of the bill say repealing the 1990 law is needed to hold medical providers accountable for negligence that causes deaths. Opponents say it will drive up medical-malpractice insurance costs and worsen problems with physician shortages. The bill received almost unanimous support in the House Civil Justice Claims Subcommittee and the House Judiciary Committee. A Senate version (SB 734) also was approved this week by the Senate Health and Human Services Appropriations Committee.</span></span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 16:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Change Backed for Mental Health Drugs</title>
<link>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=694075</link>
<guid>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=694075</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">The News Service of Florida<br />by NSF Staff<br /><br />A Senate committee Wednesday approved a proposal that supporters said would help Medicaid beneficiaries with mental illnesses get prescription drugs they need. The Senate Health Policy Committee unanimously approved the proposal (SB 264), which Sen. Gayle Harrell, R-Stuart, has filed for the legislative session that will start March 4. The bill would create an exception to what is known as “step therapy” for a series of psychiatric conditions, such as bipolar disorders, major depressive disorders and obsessive-compulsive disorders. Lawmakers in 2022 approved such an exception for drugs used to treat schizophrenia. The Medicaid program uses a “preferred drug list,” with drugs on the list also tied to rebates offered by drug manufacturers. If doctors determine it is necessary to prescribe drugs not on the preferred list, it triggers prior-authorization and step-therapy requirements. Generally, that means trying less-expensive drugs before moving to drugs that cost more. Harrell and other supporters of the bill said it is important for doctors to be able to prescribe appropriate medications to people with mental illnesses without having to first use other drugs that are not effective. </span></span></p><p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">A Senate staff analysis, however, said the state Agency for Health Care Administration, which runs the Medicaid program, thinks the proposed change could affect the program’s budget. “If numerous prescribing physicians elect to prescribe drugs that are not on the PDL (preferred drug list) under the bill, it may lead to an increase in net drug cost in therapeutic classes related to serious mental illness,” the staff analysis said. “The AHCA (Agency for Health Care Administration) estimates a significant overall fiscal increase to the Florida Medicaid program of up to $50 million per year could be possible due to utilization changes and potential loss of supplemental rebates.”</span></span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2025 13:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>August recess is here – tell Congress to Fix Medicare Now!</title>
<link>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=679173</link>
<guid>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=679173</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><em>The following message is from the American Medical Association</em>:</p><p>As Congress returns home for the annual August recess, physician advocates have unique opportunities to engage with their members of Congress "back home" in the district.
</p><p>
<a href="https://fixmedicarenow.org/fmn-advocacy-hub" target="_blank">Find out how you can take advantage of the August recess and tell Congress to Fix Medicare Now!</a>
</p><p>
This summer the American Medical Association's top federal priority remains reforming Medicare's broken physician payment system, and we need your help!
</p><p>
According to an AMA analysis of Medicare Trustees data, Medicare physician payment has been reduced 29% adjusted for inflation from 2001–2024. The Medicare physician payment system lacks an adequate annual physician payment update, unlike those that apply to other Medicare provider payments.
</p><p>
Unfortunately, CMS' recent proposed rule has physicians slated for an additional 2.8 percent Medicare payment reduction on January 1.  This latest inexcusable cut looms despite the fact that CMS also projects the increase to the MEI to be 3.6 percent in 2025.
</p><p>
That's why it's so urgent that Congress work with the physician community to develop long-term solutions to the systematic problems with the Medicare physician payment system and preserve patient access to quality care.
</p><p>
Recently, the <a href="https://fixmedicarenow.org/sites/default/files/2024-08/AMA-2024-August-Recess-Campaign_%20Fix-Medicare-Now_Webinar.mp4" target="_blank">AMA hosted a webinar</a> featuring Jason Marino, AMA Director of Congressional Affairs, who provided an update on the current state of Medicare physician payment legislation and what lies ahead during the 118th Congress and advocacy expert David Lusk of Key Advocacy who provided best practices for engaging legislators in-district including how to prepare for in-district legislative meetings, host Members of Congress at site visits, and interacting with elected officials online.
</p><p>
To make these interactions with your legislators as impactful as possible, the AMA has developed an online <a href="https://fixmedicarenow.org/fmn-advocacy-hub" target="_blank">August recess resources site</a> that is your one-stop-shop for toolkits, legislative calls to action, issue briefs, infographics and detailed information on scheduling and preparing for legislative meetings and other in-district opportunities.
</p><p>
Please join us this August recess and let Congress know that it's time to Fix Medicare Now - everyone agrees that the Medicare physician payment system is broken – <a href="https://www.votervoice.net/BroadcastLinks/8D8APFjt_byFuxqkrNh32A" target="_blank">let's do something about it!</a></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Aug 2024 17:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bills Signed to Target Cancer, Rare Diseases</title>
<link>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=675333</link>
<guid>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=675333</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">The News Service of Florida<br />by NSF Staff<br /><br />Gov. Ron DeSantis on Tuesday signed bills designed to help boost research into cancer and rare diseases. One of the bills (SB 7072) involves distribution of money to cancer centers across the state through the Casey DeSantis Cancer Research Program, named after Florida’s first lady. DeSantis last week signed a budget for the 2024-2025 fiscal year that includes $127.5 million for the program. Casey DeSantis was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2021, but the governor’s office said in 2022 she was cancer-free. Another of the measures signed Tuesday (SB 1582) includes creating the Andrew John Anderson Pediatric Rare Disease Grant Program. The program is named after the son of Rep. Adam Anderson, R-Palm Harbor. Grant amounts will be subject to appropriations by the Legislature, with money designed to go toward “scientific and clinical research to further the search for new diagnostics, treatments and cures for pediatric rare diseases.” The new budget, which will take effect July 1, provides $500,000 for the grant program. A third bill signed by DeSantis (HB 885) will authorize the health-insurance program for state workers to provide coverage for biomarker testing. The National Cancer Institute defines a biomarker as a “biological molecule found in blood, other body fluids, or tissues that is a sign of a normal or abnormal process, or of a condition or disease.”</span></span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 11:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>DeSantis Signs Major Health Care Package</title>
<link>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=668115</link>
<guid>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=668115</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">The News Service of Florida<br />by Jim Saunders<br /><br />TALLAHASSEE — Gov. Ron DeSantis on Thursday signed a package of bills that supporters say will help improve access to health care, boost the number of doctors in Florida and address issues such as mental-health treatment.<br /><br />“What they (state leaders) are tackling right now are some of the biggest challenges that we face in the Sunshine State, and that’s access to health care in a reliable, reproducible, sustainable kind of a way,” said Tampa General Hospital President and CEO John Couris, who took part in a bill-signing event in Bonita Springs. “We’re facing a myriad of challenges in the health-care industry, in the health-care system. There are critical shortages in the health-care workforce. We’ve seen an exceptional growth in labor costs. Patients are struggling to access the care they need, and the demand for behavioral-health services is at a record high.”<br /><br />The bills were a priority of Senate President Kathleen Passidomo, a Naples Republican who dubbed them the “Live Healthy” initiative. Passidomo pointed Thursday to trying to meet health-care needs of a rapidly growing population.<br /><br />“Unfortunately, the new Floridians are not bringing their health-care providers with them,” Passidomo said. “We’re going to change that. The good news is that Live Healthy will help grow Florida’s health-care workforce, increase access, incentivize innovation so Floridians can have more options and opportunities to live healthy here in the Sunshine State.”<br /><br />DeSantis signed five bills, though much of the attention has focused on a wide-ranging measure (SB 7016) that includes $717 million in spending. The bill, for example, will provide money for increased residency slots for doctors and put additional dollars into loan-forgiveness programs for health-care professionals.<br /><br />The bill also will take workforce-related steps such as helping clear the way for foreign-trained physicians to practice in Florida.<br /><br />“Health care workforce is a challenge,” state Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, who took part in the bill-signing event, said. “It’s tough to get appointments oftentimes, especially with specialty physicians. It’s tough to get a physical therapy appointment. It’s tough to see a nurse practitioner.”<br /><br />The bill also includes issues such as trying to shift patients away from hospital emergency rooms for non-emergency conditions. It will require hospitals to take steps to divert patients such as by creating a “collaborative partnership” with federally qualified health centers or other primary-care providers.<br /><br />The bill also includes allowing “advanced birth centers” that could provide cesarean-section deliveries for women who have what are considered low-risk pregnancies. Birth centers already exist but are not allowed to provide cesarean sections, which are surgical procedures done in hospitals.<br /><br />Other bills signed Thursday included a measure (SB 7018) that will provide $50 million a year for a revolving-loan fund program for health-innovation projects. The program will provide loans with a maximum interest rate of 1 percent, with priority given to applicants such as rural hospitals and organizations that provide care in medically underserved areas.<br /><br />Another bill (SB 330) will designate four behavioral-health teaching hospitals linked to universities to help address issues with treating patients for mental-health conditions.<br /><br />The linked behavioral-health teaching hospitals will be Tampa General Hospital and the University of South Florida; UF Health Shands Hospital in Gainesville and the University of Florida; UF Health Jacksonville and the University of Florida; and Jackson Memorial Hospital in Miami and the University of Miami. The bill also will allow the state Agency for Health Care Administration to designate additional behavioral-health teaching hospitals as of July 1, 2025.<br /><br />The bill will provide $100 million a year over the next three years to the teaching hospitals, with additional money provided for such things as residency positions for psychiatrists.<br /><br />“I’ve said, look, I want more beds for mental-health patients, particularly people that are not able to function in society,” DeSantis said. “And so this is going to be, I think, a key component of that, and I think it’s something that’s going to be very, very meaningful.”<br /><br />Other bills signed were a measure (SB 1758) that addresses programs and services at the Agency for Persons with Disabilities and a measure (SB 322) that creates a public-records exemption for certain health-care professionals.<br /><br />The bills moved through the Legislature with almost no opposition, though Democrats repeatedly argued that the package should include expanding eligibility for Medicaid — an idea rejected for the past decade by Republican leaders.<br /><br />Passidomo made clear as she began moving forward with the legislation that she would not consider expanding Medicaid.<br /><br />“Access to health care is important at every phase of life,” Passidomo said Thursday. “Insurance, including Medicaid and Medicare, does not guarantee access. Even Floridians with great insurance face barriers to care.”</span></span>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2024 13:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Behavioral-Health Teaching Hospitals Backed</title>
<link>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=666196</link>
<guid>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=666196</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">The News Service of Florida<br />By Jim Saunders<br /><br />TALLAHASSEE — The Florida Senate on Wednesday unanimously passed a plan that would designate at least four behavioral-health teaching hospitals, as lawmakers look to improve care for people with mental-health and substance-abuse issues.<br /><br />“This is the next step in really modernizing the whole system of mental health,” Senate Health and Human Services Appropriations Chairwoman Gayle Harrell, R-Stuart, said. “When you look at the problem that we have, not just in the state of Florida but across the country, in the whole mental-health, substance-abuse issues, we have got to address that. It came to the forefront during the (COVID-19) pandemic, certainly, and people began to realize how important mental health and behavioral health is.”<br /><br />The bill (SB 330), sponsored by Sen. Jim Boyd, R-Bradenton, would designate four behavioral-health teaching hospitals linked to universities. They would be Tampa General Hospital and the University of South Florida; UF Health Shands Hospital in Gainesville and the University of Florida; UF Health Jacksonville and the University of Florida; and Jackson Memorial Hospital in Miami and the University of Miami.<br /><br />Also, it would allow the state Agency for Health Care Administration to designate four more behavioral-health teaching hospitals over the next two years.<br /><br />A House version of the bill (HB 1617), sponsored by House Health Care Appropriations Chairman Sam Garrison, R-Fleming Island, has moved through committees and is positioned to go to the full House. The Senate made changes Wednesday to its bill, with Boyd indicating the Senate and House have tried to work out differences.<br /><br />The Senate bill would provide $100 million a year over the next three years to the behavioral-health teaching hospitals, with additional money provided for such things as residency positions for psychiatrists.<br /><br />For example, the bill during the upcoming 2024-2025 fiscal year would provide $6 million for 10 residency positions at each of the four designated teaching hospitals through what is known as the state’s “Slots for Doctors Program.” It would provide another $6 million for residency slots if additional teaching hospitals are designated.<br /><br />Also, it would provide $5 million for a newly created Florida Center for Behavioral Health Workforce at the Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute at the University of South Florida. The teaching hospitals would work with the center about behavioral-health workforce issues.<br /><br />In addition, the bill would require teaching hospitals to take steps such as working with the universities on programs for students in colleges of medicine, nursing, psychology, social work and public health “related to the entire continuum of behavioral health care, including, at a minimum, screening, therapeutic and supportive services, community outpatient care, crisis stabilization, short-term residential treatment and long-term care,” the bill said.<br /><br />“This (bill) is groundbreaking in terms of mental health and teaching hospitals in the state of Florida,” Sen. Darryl Rouson, a St. Petersburg Democrat who has long worked on behavioral-health issues, said Wednesday.<br /><br />The bill has been linked to a broader effort by Senate President Kathleen Passidomo, R-Naples, to increase the number of doctors in the state and expand access to health care. The Senate and House have passed a plan that Passidomo’ calls the “Live Healthy” proposal, which is ready to go to Gov. Ron DeSantis.<br /><br />While Passidomo’s plan would address a broad swath of health-care issues — from increasing medical-residency slots to trying to provide care outside emergency rooms for patients with non-emergency conditions — the Boyd and Garrison bills are more narrowly focused on behavioral health.</span></span>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 13:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>A Step Closer to Living Healthy</title>
<link>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=662975</link>
<guid>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=662975</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-size: 14px;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">The News Service of Florida<br />by Ryan Dailey, NSF<br /><br />TALLAHASSEE — Just two weeks into the start of the 2024 legislative session, House and Senate leaders’ major priorities are sailing through the process — with Senate President Kathleen Passidomo seeing one of her wish-list items pass in the upper chamber on Thursday.<br /><br />Senators voted unanimously to approve a wide-ranging plan that Passidomo and other supporters have touted as a strategy to expand health-care access as the state’s population continues to grow.<br /><br />In an attempt to keep up with ballooning health care demand, the two bills that comprise the plan are designed to make changes such as increasing the number of doctors in the state, shifting patients away from emergency rooms and boosting health-innovation efforts.<br /><br />Senate Health and Human Services Appropriations Chairwoman Gayle Harrell, a Stuart Republican who has long worked on health-care issues, called one of the bills (SB 7016) “probably the most comprehensive health-care bill I have ever seen.”<br /><br />“It is changing the direction of health care,” Harrell said. “It’s going to make it more open and have more access for people. When we look at the population of Florida and the influx of people we have, we have to have providers out there.”<br /><br />As is true with any legislation, the Senate and House will have to come to an agreement on a final product in order for it to reach the governor’s desk — and the Senate measures’ projected costs differ from a House version of the plan.<br /><br />For example, Senate Health Policy Chairwoman Colleen Burton, R-Lakeland, said an initial version of one of the bills would have cost about $800 million. But the Senate trimmed about $70 million before passing the bill Thursday. The House proposal would cost about $580 million.<br /><br />“We don’t operate in a vacuum, and we have partners across the rotunda (in the House) who we have been talking to,” Burton said.<br /><br />The other Senate bill (SB 7018), sponsored by Harrell, would set up a revolving-loan fund program for health innovation projects. That bill initially called for putting $75 million a year into the fund, but a change Thursday dropped the amount to $50 million.<br /><br />The Senate plan also has a focus on helping Florida retain doctors who are graduating from medical school.<br /><br />“It makes no sense to graduate people from medical school and not have residency programs for them here in Florida and then they go to another state,” Passidomo, R-Naples, told reporters Thursday. “It doesn’t make sense because when they move to another state and they put down roots, they stay there.”<br /><br />House versions of the bills started moving forward last week.</span></span>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Medical Malpractice Issue Back in House</title>
<link>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=652255</link>
<guid>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=652255</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">The News Service of Florida<br />by NSF Staff<br /><br />The Florida House could again take up an issue about whether parents should be able to seek damages for mental pain and suffering when their adult children die because of alleged medical malpractice. Rep. Spencer Roach, R-North Fort Myers, filed a bill (HB 77) on Thursday that would eliminate a prohibition on parents of adult children pursuing such damages in malpractice cases. The House passed the change in 2021 and 2022, but it was not approved by the Senate. The proposal drew opposition in the past from physician groups and insurers, which argued that it would lead to increased malpractice insurance premiums. But supporters of the change described situations in which patients died because of alleged medical malpractice without recourse. Roach’s bill is filed for the 2024 legislative session, which will start in January.</span></span>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 23:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Renner Creates Health Select Committee</title>
<link>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=651151</link>
<guid>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=651151</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">The News Service of Florida<br />by NSF Staff<br /><br />Signaling that health care could be a key issue during the 2024 legislative session, House Speaker Paul Renner, R-Palm Coast, announced Friday that he has created the House Select Committee on Health Innovation. The committee, which will be chaired by Rep. Kaylee Tuck, R-Lake Placid, will “review issues relating to access and affordability in health care,” Renner said in a memo to House members. Senate President Kathleen Passidomo, R-Naples, also said during an appearance this summer on the “Deeper Dive with Dara Kam” podcast that she wants to take steps during the 2024 session to attract more health-care providers. “We do not have enough providers, whether it be physicians, nurses, technicians … facilities to handle our current population comfortably and easily,” Passidomo said. “You know, I hear oftentimes from constituents that if they want to have some kind of elective surgery, they have got to wait eight months to a year to get in.” Without “creative solutions,” she said, “it’s only going to get worse.” Renner also announced Friday that he is recreating the Select Committee on Hurricane Resiliency &amp; Recovery “to review Florida’s recovery efforts surrounding hurricanes and to ensure that we are prepared for future storms.” The move came a little more than a week after Category 3 Hurricane Idalia hit parts of North Florida. Majority Leader Michael Grant, R-Port Charlotte, will chair the hurricane select committee. The 2024 session will start Jan. 9. The House has scheduled an initial series of subcommittee meetings on Sept. 19 to begin preparing for the session.</span></span>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Sep 2023 22:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Physician Restrictions Targeted in House</title>
<link>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=649572</link>
<guid>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=649572</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">The News Service of Florida<br />by NSF Staff<br /><br />A House Republican on Monday filed a proposal that would eliminate certain restrictions on where physicians can practice. Rep. Joel Rudman, a Navarre Republican who is a physician, filed the bill (HB 11) for consideration during the 2024 legislative session, which will start in January. The bill addresses what are known as “restrictive covenants,” which can restrict doctors from practicing in areas after, for example, contracts or partnerships end. The bill would bar such restrictions, saying they are “not supported by a legitimate business interest” and are “void and unenforceable.” The Legislature in 2019 passed a measure that put limits on restrictive covenants, but the Rudman proposal would go further. The 2019 law cited covenants restricting patient access to physicians and increasing costs.</span></span>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 16:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Medical Marijuana Telehealth Bill Signed</title>
<link>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=644450</link>
<guid>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=644450</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">The News Service of Florida<br />by NSF Staff<br /><br />Patients will be allowed to use telehealth to renew physician approvals for medical marijuana, under a bill signed Monday by Gov. Ron DeSantis. The bill (HB 387) also could help Black farmers get valuable medical-marijuana licenses after years of delays. Under the measure, physicians will still have to conduct in-person exams before approving patients for medical marijuana. But it will allow physicians to use telehealth visits for exams needed to renew approvals, an option that supporters say will increase patient access to medical-marijuana treatment. Many patients have been diagnosed with serious medical conditions that make it difficult for them to travel to doctors’ offices. “I’m thrilled. It’s a great win for patients,” Barry Gordon, a Venice-based physician who specializes in medical marijuana, told The News Service of Florida after DeSantis signed the bill. The measure also seeks to address a controversy about medical-marijuana licenses for Black farmers. A 2017 law that provided an overall framework for the medical-marijuana industry required health officials to issue a license to a Black farmer who was a “recognized class member” in class-action lawsuits over lending discrimination by the federal government — known as the “Pigford” litigation. But the Florida Department of Health did not choose a Black farmer for the license until September 2022, when it selected Suwannee County farmer Terry Donnell Gwinn. The decision to award a license to Gwinn has been challenged in court, and the license has not been issued. The bill could lead to the Department of Health issuing a license to Gwinn and possibly other applicants, based on certain criteria.</span></span>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2023 01:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Budget Steers $190 Million to Cancer Research</title>
<link>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=643731</link>
<guid>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=643731</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">The News Service of Florida<br />by NSF Staff<br /><br />About $190 million in the state budget for the next fiscal year will go toward cancer research and care, as Gov. Ron DeSantis signed off on the state spending plan Thursday. The bulk of the cancer-related funding — roughly $111.6 million — will go toward the Casey DeSantis Cancer Research Program. Speaking during a bill-signing event in Fort Pierce Tuesday, the governor highlighted that the overall cancer funding will be dispersed among numerous entities. “My wife has really spearheaded that,” DeSantis said. “I think she’s smart about, you know, the same old stuff, giving it to the same people. … We want to have more competition for this money. And we want people who are willing to innovate and maybe think outside the box a little bit.” The governor’s office announced in 2021 that Casey DeSantis had been diagnosed with breast cancer. DeSantis’ office in March 2022 said that the First Lady was cancer-free. All cancer centers that receive funding through the Casey Desantis Cancer Research program will be required to submit data to the state about new cancer diagnoses and cancer recurrence. A number of cancer research entities also are poised to get millions of dollars in funding through the budget. The Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute is in line to receive nearly $20.6 million, and the William G. "Bill" Bankhead, Jr., and David Coley Cancer Research Program will get $10 million. The plan also steers $4 million to the Live Like Bella Childhood Cancer Foundation. The budget also includes $20 million for grants intended to “support innovative cancer research, including emerging research trends and promising practices, which can serve as a catalyst for further exploration.”</span></span>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 22:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>KidCare, ‘Medication Aides’ Bills Teed Up</title>
<link>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=643211</link>
<guid>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=643211</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">The News Service of Florida<br />by NSF Staff<br /><br />Gov. Ron DeSantis on Monday formally received bills that would expand eligibility for the KidCare subsidized health-insurance program and allow trained certified nursing assistants to provide medications to nursing-home residents. Lawmakers unanimously passed the bills during the legislative session that ended May 5. The KidCare bill (HB 121) would revamp an income threshold for families. Under KidCare, families who do not qualify for Medicaid can pay $15 or $20 a month in premiums to insure children. Subsidized coverage is available to families with incomes up to 200 percent of the federal poverty level, or about $60,000 for a family of four, according to a House staff analysis. The bill would increase that threshold to 300 percent of the federal poverty level, or $90,000 for a family of four. The nursing home-related bill (SB 558) would allow certified nursing assistants to become trained as “qualified medication aides.” They could then administer what supporters have described as “routine” medications to nursing-home residents, freeing up registered nurses to provide other needed care. Also, qualified medication aides could perform tasks such as checking residents’ blood glucose levels.</span></span>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2023 00:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>New Law Aims to Protect Hospital Workers</title>
<link>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=641339</link>
<guid>https://www.dcmsonline.org/news/news.asp?id=641339</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-size: 16px;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">The News Service of Florida<br />by NSF Staff<br /><br />Amid workplace-safety concerns, Gov. Ron DeSantis on Wednesday signed a bill that will increase criminal penalties for people who assault hospital employees and volunteers. Lawmakers passed the bill (HB 825) during the legislative session that ended May 5. State law has included increased penalties for people who assault emergency-room employees, but the bill expands those protections to other hospital workers. After the House passed the bill April 20, the Florida Hospital Association released a statement that said hospital workers are six times more likely than average workers to suffer from violence. “This legislation will lead to better patient care by creating a safer working environment for our health-care workers,” Mary Mayhew, president and CEO of the association, said at the time. Assault charges typically are second-degree misdemeanors, but under the bill they will be upgraded to first-degree misdemeanors for assaults on hospital workers. Similarly, battery charges are typically first-degree misdemeanors but will be upgraded to third-degree felonies.</span></span>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 00:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
